Comments on: Hackers: Unite For Burmese Freedom! http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/ The voice of The Sietch community Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:22:28 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: myanmar parts is Where http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-83781 myanmar parts is Where Sat, 10 May 2008 04:41:27 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/#comment-83781 is Where myanmar wish <a href="http://where-is-myanmar.barerube.cn" rel="nofollow">myanmar Where can is</a> [url=http://where-is-myanmar.barerube.cn]myanmar Where can is[/url] is Where myanmar wish myanmar Where can is [url=http://where-is-myanmar.barerube.cn]myanmar Where can is[/url]

]]> By: hakke http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-76418 hakke Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:04:10 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/#comment-76418 It has been accomplished before. It can be done again: http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/2000/08/01/www.myanmar.com/mirror.html Thanks for your support. *.mm gov websites, rot in root hell. It has been accomplished before. It can be done again:

http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/2000/08/01/www.myanmar.com/mirror.html

Thanks for your support.

*.mm gov websites, rot in root hell.

]]> By: Hakke http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-76397 Hakke Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:20:22 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/10/01/hackers-unite-for-burmese-freedom/#comment-76397 There are plenty of reasons to take these fuckers down. Also involved is the American company Fortinet according to Wikipedia: According to the OpenNet Initiative [6], FortiGuard is used by the dictatorship of Myanmar (Burma) to block communications critical of the regime carried over the internet, a system known as the Myanmar Wide Web [7]. Fortinet has promised to investigate the allegations, and the implied violation of US Government sanctions against the regime, noting that the software may have been sold to the regime by a third party [8]; however, the company has yet to make a definitive statement on the matter. Meanwhile, the Myanmar government features its adoption of the Fortinet firewall on its official website [9] with other photos showing a Fortinet sales director presenting a gift to the Myanmar Prime Minister during a ceremony [10]. In 2005, the gpl-violations.org project uncovered evidence that Fortinet had used GPL code in its products against the terms of the license, and used cryptographic tools to conceal the violation. The violation was alleged to have occurred in the FortiOS system, which the gpl-violations.org project said contained elements of the linux kernel. In response, a Munich court granted a temporary injunction against the company, preventing it from selling products until they were in compliance with the necessary license terms [11]. Fortinet was forced to make parts of FortiOS source code available free in compliance with GPL licensing [12]. There are plenty of reasons to take these fuckers down. Also involved
is the American company Fortinet according to Wikipedia:

According to the OpenNet Initiative [6], FortiGuard is used by the dictatorship of Myanmar (Burma) to block communications critical of the regime carried over the internet, a system known as the Myanmar Wide Web [7]. Fortinet has promised to investigate the allegations, and the implied violation of US Government sanctions against the regime, noting that the software may have been sold to the regime by a third party [8]; however, the company has yet to make a definitive statement on the matter. Meanwhile, the Myanmar government features its adoption of the Fortinet firewall on its official website [9] with other photos showing a Fortinet sales director presenting a gift to the Myanmar Prime Minister during a ceremony [10].

In 2005, the gpl-violations.org project uncovered evidence that Fortinet had used GPL code in its products against the terms of the license, and used cryptographic tools to conceal the violation. The violation was alleged to have occurred in the FortiOS system, which the gpl-violations.org project said contained elements of the linux kernel. In response, a Munich court granted a temporary injunction against the company, preventing it from selling products until they were in compliance with the necessary license terms [11]. Fortinet was forced to make parts of FortiOS source code available free in compliance with GPL licensing [12].

]]>