You Warmists like to pretend like it is a case closed deal, but anyone who really looks into the issue for themselves can tell that the case for AGW is exceedingly weak and grossly overstated. I feel as though I am being pressured to buy something that I do not want and do not believe that I need. What’s worse many of the “solutions” that are being proposed will lead to real environmental problems, such as bio-fuel and wind power. Even nuclear power is not something that should be rushed into, although if AGW turns out to be real then we should start building nuclear plants.

If the Global Warmists slow down and stop the hysterics, then it might be possible to create a reasonable solution which will improve out lives and our livelihoods rather than be a destructive force to our personal wellbeing.

Understand that everyone wants to live in an age of abundance. No one wants to go without or see anyone else go without. I want everyone to be well feed, free and wealthy enough to do what they want in life. I want this for everyone, not just me. Energy is key to maintaining an abundance for everyone, so when someone starts talking about getting by with less, I turn them off because they are not proposing a solution but rather they are merely making trouble for us common folk.

So assume that we really do need to reduce our carbon emissions, what could we do to accomplish this goal without sacrificing our freedom, prosperiety or comfort, but instead increasing all of these things? Why don’t the Global Warming people propose doing something like creating a high speed train network here in America like they have in Europe? That would reduce the need to use cars and Jets airplanes right? It would enhance our freedom and might even lower our travel expenses, while lowering our CO2 output.

Why not propose rebuilding our cities to support denser population densities, while making them beautiful. This could be done writing a building code through something like HUD which could provide interest free loans to building projects which not only enhance our energy efficiency but also our culture. Provide they exclude corporate builders, they could be made interest free so we all become a wealthier more cultured civilization.

I see the global warming as people who are really not interested in building anything that will improve our lives or our culture, but rather as promoters of policies that will destroy culture by promoting corporate builders or destroying wealth by promoting foolishness like running a country on wind and solar, while ignoring the fact that the price of gasoline is the big issue now, and unless something is done about it, it will only increase the cost of taking steps that will be needed to build a better world to a standard that everyone can agree on.

Alarmism is bad politics and bad form. If Global Warming is real it is not something that is going to go away and it is not something that we need to make heroic efforts to solve tomarrow. Right now that facts on the ground appear that Global Warming peaked and now the Earth is entering a cooling period, so the whole thing might have been a false alarm, and for what? To make us all feel less secure and guilty about living our lives? I honestly resent the tone of the Global Warming people, and think that the whole thing is a hoax which is the reason for the alarmism. They need people to act quick so a few rich people like T. Boone can get rich before the weather changes. Sorry, but I am not buying until there is stronger evidence for the case of Global Warming.

Although, fast trains, nuclear power and geothermal likely would not be bad deals, Global Warming or not. To avoid skeptics like me, it would behoove your cause to champion policies that would be good whether there is Global Warming or not. You might get a lot more traction that way, FYI.

So if someone was on a sinking ship and they desperately wanted you to get into the life boat, you wouldn’t listen to them because they were panicking?

Besides most of these people are not panicking, they are very very concerned. You should be smart enough to know the difference

How long are the results going to have to not match the looney predicitions of doom by the IPCC, for you to accept that they are full of crap. This solar cycle is late, which means that the world is going to get cool. The last solar cycles were early, which kept the Earth warm.

There have been peer reviewed papers out of China and Russia that claim that we are going into as period of Global Cooling. So there. You’ve been duped!

Want more evidence? How about the fact that none of the Global Warming lunatics are doing anything to reduce their own CO2 emissions? Only thing that can stop increasing CO2 emissions is to greatly reduce the human population, and I have not seen any of the advocates volunteer. Maybe if David Suzuki and Algore lead a mass suicide, I might be convinced that they actually believe their own bullshit, but the truth is, that this whole thing is a conjob and the new face of Nazism.

Now if you can find me a peer reviewed paper that proves that it is not a new manifestation of Nazism then I might revise my current position, but it damn sure looks like an excuse to kill a whole bunch of people to me.

I’m bored with refuting AGW sceptics so won’t even bother. Find me one peer-reviewed paper that puts serious doubt on AGW then I will take your views seriously.

K