jump to navigation
Recent Comments:
- mj: Nice information but a bit hard to read. Will go see on the NGF link you provided. Just to point out a little correction, on your first line of...
- Jordan.C: but the thing is im a girl and every one thinks its really werried that i enjoy this it has been my dream to fish with some one as good...
- Jordan.C: i live in indianapolis and i love fishing but those are some really big fish i just want to no how you got them to the shor it took me...
- Paul: That is really good attempt I work in China ,Our company producing solar flat plate collector, The art is same with what you are doing. But...
- Ayden: I live in Ohio, and the Alligator Gar are definitely still there. Me and a few friends went down to the little Miami and stumbled across one...
- Sid: Ahh. Totally agree. I just love the feeling when I whizz past all those tired/frustrated office goers waiting in a queue during peak hour. The...
- Anderson: Interesting and Informative post!!! Really good work done by you. Keep it up
- Tom Shill: Gloom & doom gloom & doom The world is coming to an end and after only 4 billion years
- zeina: I Like 2 have even one Baby..
- leo schott box 616 co.hwy 425 oran mo 63771: please send me the info on how do this i raise poultry to and need very much to save my heat
Comments»
I know I shouldn’t take this seriously but…”You’re driving down the highway…”
So there’s the problem. Not A/C or Windows – it’s the fact that you’re driving.
Environmentalism is really so easy – as a rule of thumb just do and use less of everything – it’s only made complex because companies and politicians *want it to be complex*. Confusion prevents action and means nothing will change – that’s what the system wants.
Will SLATE or Mr. Stephen Colbert ever discuss the global challenge posed by the human overpopulation of Earth with the kind of concentrated and sustained attention this looming threat to humanity deserves?
The widely shared and consensually-validated belief in the overall decline in absolute global human population numbers in our time, leading to population stabilization worldwide in 2050, is simply and straightforwardly a specious, inadequate product of preternatural thought as well as a colossal misperception. Many too many powerbrokers inside and outside the manmade global political economy have actively supported the unrealistic belief in population stabilization because it has proven to be politically convenient, economically expedient and supportive of their selfish interests.
According to new, unwelcome, unchallenged and apparently unforeseen scientific evidence of the human overpopulation of Earth, we can understand the growth or decline of the population numbers of the human species primarily as a function of global food supply. This means that human population dynamics of the human species is essentially common to, not different from, the population dynamics of other species. From a global or species perspective, more food equals more people; less food equals less people; and, in any case, no food equals no people.
Please consider this request. Could someone at SLATE or Stephen Colbert ask top-rank scientists to carefully and skillfully examine the emerging science of human population dynamics and report their findings?
Sincerely,
Steve
Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on the Human Population, established 2001
http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php