<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California&#8217;s Renewable Energy Propositions 7 And 10 Hotly Contested</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2008/10/01/californias-renewable-energy-propositions-7-and-10-hotly-contested/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2008/10/01/californias-renewable-energy-propositions-7-and-10-hotly-contested/</link>
	<description>The voice of The Sietch community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:39:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2008/10/01/californias-renewable-energy-propositions-7-and-10-hotly-contested/comment-page-1/#comment-85780</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=4171#comment-85780</guid>
		<description>Prop 10 would cost Californians $10 BILLION to repay the bonds. Most of the handouts ($2.5 billion) do NOT go to &quot;high efficiency&quot; vehicles like hybrids. They go to &quot;clean&quot; trucks. Prop 10&#039;s definition of &quot;clean&quot; exclude hybrids, because they are partially fueled by gasoline. Prop 10&#039;s  definition of &quot;clean&quot;  is tailor made to fund natural gas powered trucks, at up to $50,000 per new truck purchased. Guess what - T Boone Pickens dominates the natural gas gas station business. Prop 10 is a bonanza for Pickens.

The California League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club OPPOSE PROP 10, because it is a phony, pretending to be green. It diverts precious dollars away from alternative energy options that have a future and onto a dead-end fossil fuel road.

check out: www.stopprop10.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prop 10 would cost Californians $10 BILLION to repay the bonds. Most of the handouts ($2.5 billion) do NOT go to &#8220;high efficiency&#8221; vehicles like hybrids. They go to &#8220;clean&#8221; trucks. Prop 10&#8217;s definition of &#8220;clean&#8221; exclude hybrids, because they are partially fueled by gasoline. Prop 10&#8217;s  definition of &#8220;clean&#8221;  is tailor made to fund natural gas powered trucks, at up to $50,000 per new truck purchased. Guess what &#8211; T Boone Pickens dominates the natural gas gas station business. Prop 10 is a bonanza for Pickens.</p>
<p>The California League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club OPPOSE PROP 10, because it is a phony, pretending to be green. It diverts precious dollars away from alternative energy options that have a future and onto a dead-end fossil fuel road.</p>
<p>check out: <a href="http://www.stopprop10.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.stopprop10.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Posa</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2008/10/01/californias-renewable-energy-propositions-7-and-10-hotly-contested/comment-page-1/#comment-85776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Posa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=4171#comment-85776</guid>
		<description>Prop 10 is bond that will cost $10 million.
Prop 7 does not affect your taxes.  
How are they similar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prop 10 is bond that will cost $10 million.<br />
Prop 7 does not affect your taxes.<br />
How are they similar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.515 seconds -->
