Comments on: The Logical Absurdity Of Climate Change Denial http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/ The voice of The Sietch community Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:22:41 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: keithf http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88725 keithf Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:26:40 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88725 Roger, do you have *all* the facts about solar power - I mean *all* of them? Roger, do you have *all* the facts about solar power – I mean *all* of them?

]]> By: keithf http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88724 keithf Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:25:57 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88724 And still no one has responded to what is in the article. And still no one has responded to what is in the article.

]]> By: Roger from Solar Power Facts http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88723 Roger from Solar Power Facts Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:41:07 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88723 To take up any position as certain without ALL the facts is absurd. To refuse to change that position on the presentation of facts that contradicts the position is also absurd. That is, unless you have a vested interest in maintaining that position which is most often the case. To take up any position as certain without ALL the facts is absurd. To refuse to change that position on the presentation of facts that contradicts the position is also absurd. That is, unless you have a vested interest in maintaining that position which is most often the case.

]]> By: keithf http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88722 keithf Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:25:36 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88722 Oh, well, in that case, as you felt you had to hijack the post, I shall delete your comment as irrelevant - let's say, denial advertising. Oh, well, in that case, as you felt you had to hijack the post, I shall delete your comment as irrelevant – let’s say, denial advertising.

]]> By: Klem http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88721 Klem Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:45:10 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88721 My response was not really for you either. It's for some readers who might be on the tipping edge. Thanks. My response was not really for you either. It’s for some readers who might be on the tipping edge. Thanks.

]]> By: keithf http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88720 keithf Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:02:30 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88720 N.B. This article wasn't for you; it was about people like you. Everything you typed justified the reason for the article - thanks for making that clear to everyone else. N.B. This article wasn’t for you; it was about people like you. Everything you typed justified the reason for the article – thanks for making that clear to everyone else.

]]> By: keithf http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88719 keithf Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:09:11 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88719 I'm not falling into your trap, Klem. I’m not falling into your trap, Klem.

]]> By: Klem http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2009/07/07/the-logical-absurdity-of-climate-change-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-88718 Klem Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:55:51 +0000 http://www.blog.thesietch.org/?p=6248#comment-88718 Oh my lord, you call that long air-headed essay logical? Are you kidding me? There was no logical argument anywhere in it. That so called logic would not change my “denialist” opinion in any way. Terrible. [remainder of comment removed as not relevant to article] Oh my lord, you call that long air-headed essay logical? Are you kidding me? There was no logical argument anywhere in it. That so called logic would not change my “denialist” opinion in any way. Terrible.

[remainder of comment removed as not relevant to article]

]]>